Deep slate diagnosis — 20261001
- Games: 1 · hits 1 · misses 0 · winner accuracy 1.0
- Mean total-run bias on losses: None (negative = under-projected)
- Mean team-run error on losses: None · mean Brier on losses: None
Loss primary drivers
High-level causal issue register
[HIGH] Published margins are compressed relative to realized margins
- Domain:
score_distribution· affected: PHI@ATL - Evidence: 1/1 predictions were ≤2 runs; 1/1 actual margins were ≥4; mean predicted margin 1.00 vs actual 4.00
- Action: Check whether predicted margins are too narrow across several recent out-of-sample slates (measuring tail coverage and margin MAE) before widening the score spread.
- Do not infer: A single blowout game is not a reason to widen every score prediction.
[HIGH] Published confidence buckets were poorly aligned on this slate
- Domain:
calibration· affected: PHI@ATL - Evidence: weighted absolute calibration error 0.4832 across 1 games
- Action: Watch the same confidence buckets over the full rolling window before changing any calibration weight.
- Do not infer: A single slate has far too few games to establish a stable calibration curve.
[HIGH] Validated run models explain very little holdout variance
- Domain:
model_validation· affected: PHI@ATL - Evidence: home/away/total R² = 0.0021/0.0309/0.0024
- Action: Treat exact run scores as low-confidence estimates, and look for stronger features or a better target before tuning the score tails.
- Do not infer: A small positive R² only means the model beats guessing the average; it does not make the exact scores reliable.
[INFO] Every settled game received structural QA
- Domain:
coverage· affected: PHI@ATL - Evidence: 4/1 games structurally audited
- Action: Keep the per-game audit receipt in every report.
- Do not infer: Full audit coverage does not cancel the findings raised inside the audited games.
[INFO] Simulation produced no winner-direction intervention on this slate
- Domain:
simulation· affected: PHI@ATL - Evidence: flip candidates 0; published flips 0
- Action: Measure the simulation's contribution across rolling slates, separating score realization from winner flipping.
- Do not infer: Zero winner flips is not a defect and does not mean the simulation did no score-reconciliation work.
Cross-slate trends (persistent-pattern memory)
- Window: 20260921, 20260922, 20260923, 20260924, 20260925, 20260926, 20260927, , 20260929, 20260930, 20261001 (10 prior slates loaded)
- Highest-confidence pick loss streak: 0 slate(s)
- Actionable pattern detected: True
Escalated persistent patterns
- score_margin_compression — 3 consecutive slates (5 in window)
- Target lever(s): score.variance_multiplier, score.variance_floor
- Direction: widen run distributions
- Guardrail: score_margin_compression has persisted 3 consecutive slates; this is no longer single-slate noise. Treat it as an actionable pattern and propose a bounded shadow experiment against a target lever.
- simulation_inert_on_slate — 11 consecutive slates (11 in window)
- Target lever(s): simulation.allow_score
- Direction: confirm the simulation module is running, not silently no-oping
- Guardrail: simulation_inert_on_slate has persisted 11 consecutive slates; this is no longer single-slate noise. Treat it as an actionable pattern and raise the code/diagnostic action named; do not force a parameter move.
- single_slate_calibration_instability — 3 consecutive slates (7 in window)
- Target lever(s): confidence.empirical_max_weight, confidence.base_cap, confidence.moderate_cap
- Direction: increase empirical shrinkage
- Guardrail: single_slate_calibration_instability has persisted 3 consecutive slates; this is no longer single-slate noise. Treat it as an actionable pattern and propose a bounded shadow experiment against a target lever.
- weak_run_model_signal — 3 consecutive slates (10 in window)
- Target lever(s): training.xgb.n_estimators, training.xgb.max_depth, training.xgb.learning_rate
- Direction: investigate features/target via isolated training backtest (manual)
- Guardrail: weak_run_model_signal has persisted 3 consecutive slates; this is no longer single-slate noise. Treat it as an actionable pattern and raise the code/diagnostic action named; do not force a parameter move.
Metric direction across the window
winner_accuracy: improving · series [0.3333, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6667, 0.6471, 0.5385, 0.6429, None, 1.0, 0.75, 1.0]weighted_calibration_error: regressing · series [0.2028, 0.1881, 0.1108, 0.1701, 0.1302, 0.1524, 0.1031, None, 0.4792, 0.2317, 0.4832]margin_bias: regressing · series [-2.667, -1.867, -1.188, -1.083, -1.706, -3.0, -1.571, None, -4.25, -2.75, -3.0]mean_team_run_error_on_losses: improving · series [3.0, 6.222, 5.75, 3.5, 5.333, 6.167, 4.8, None, None, 2.0, None]
Pipeline stage quality
historical_ml: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.6753, margin MAE 3.3506variance_applied: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0enhanced_prediction: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0embedded_savant_run_environment: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0fundamental_edge_target_review: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0capped_target: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0simulation_result: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0published_final: winner 1/1 (1.0), team-run MAE 1.5, margin MAE 3.0
Probability lineage
- PHI@ATL: raw 0.5453 → calibrated 0.5278 → published 0.5168; score coherence followed by matchup-recency guardrail
Every game, in detail
PHI@ATL — ✅ hit
- Predicted ATL 3-4 (conf +0.03, toss_up) · actual ATL 2-6
- Root cause: toss_up_went_our_way
- Errors: winner correct · Brier 0.233465 · team-run err 3.0 · total bias -1
Cross-game lever tension
Each candidate fix, with the games it would help and the games it would hurt. A lever that repairs one game and breaks two is visible here before it is proposed.
score.variance_multiplier / score.variance_floor (widen run distributions)
- Targets: brier_score, calibration_error
- Net: 0 helped vs 0 hurt
player.pitcher.v4 form weights / player.pitcher_prior_games
- Targets: starter_er_mae, starter_outs_mae
- Net: 0 helped vs 1 hurt
- Would hurt / risk:
- PHI@ATL (hit): starter projection was accurate (ER off 1); reweight risks disturbing it
recent. / season. run-mean weighting
- Targets: team_run_mae, total_run_mae, accuracy
- Net: 0 helped vs 0 hurt